JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 25, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Hernando Martinez Castillo Vs. Cajanal

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se revocó el auto proferido por la Sala Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla y en su lugar remitirle el expediente para que resuelva el recurso de impugnación interpuesto por el apoderado del ciudadano de la referencia, de conformidad con lo previsto en el inciso segundo del numeral primero del Art. 1º del Decreto Reglamentario 1382 de 2000.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. REVOCAR el auto del 13 de diciembre de 2002 proferido por la Sala Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla y en su lugar, remitirle el expediente para que resuelva el recurso de impugnacion interpuesto por el apoderado del senor Hernando Martinez Castillo contra la sentencia del 26 de noviembre de 2002, proferida dentro de la accion de tutela de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.